Friday, April 29, 2005

ATTENTION: CHELATING COMPOUNDS

I've been e-mailing Chelating Compounds, asking her to visit my humble abode, but I'm not getting any replies. I wonder why. Ascared? Rendered speechless with my shining beauty?
Caffeine, ditto on what you said about KanonA's stories. I'm not even trying to be offensive here. After I followed more closely the war you guys waged, one just has to wonder why she's siding with the moron called Chelating Compounds. It led me to think that she might just want to side with the underdog so between the two of them, there'd be enough attention to go around. I also wonder why I could no longer see that post in LJ that someone pointed me towards. She admitted she was a hypocrite and an idiot but I think she never admitted that very important thing that would explain all the things she did. She's green with envy. The same goes for Chelating Compounds. But anyway, I really think KanonA's forgettable and the only things of interest about her are (1) she sounds so much like the Anonymous poster and (2) she's the only one I know who had corresponded with the delirious and dumb, attention whore Chelating Compounds. Stuff that are good for speculation.
My point is why hasn't Chelating shown up here? Is she trying to get rid of her histrionic behavior? Or does she want to prove us wrong that she's an attention whore?

Chelating Compounds, we just want some of your goddamn affection, er attention.

As for me, my curiosity burns so bright that I'm inclined to present a condition. I'll let her speak first, and for that time, I'll try to suppress all my preconceptions. If there's a misunderstanding that you want to clarify, try to be civil about it. Come on people, from her standpoint caused by the inconsistency and the crudeness of her remarks and actions, even the best MENSA member couldn't argue his way out of it without admitting that he was being a jerk.

Hey, niceness is very difficult for me. I'm an intelligent beautiful ass 99% of the time so don't expect more of this.

The floor is yours CC.

Caffeine-addict yo!

I guess the answer to your questions, which I suppose are rhetorical so it makes me a dumb person if I answer them but in any case, I discovered a likely but not stated truth.

The favoritism (that which has manifested by the solidarity of our community of grace and intelligence) is caused - if I can claim to be in that circle of heavenly intellectuals - by our good looks. It's so simple. Now I know why these people are dying to piss me/us off. If they can't gain our attention with talent and sagacity, then they must appeal to our innate sense of beauty by perversion/desecration of that which we like.

Flooding me own blog. My apologies, me hearties.

Thursday, April 28, 2005

To Paopao & anyone who's interested

Still spreading the love.

I thought about some things and I would just like to clarify again where I stand. Maybe dumb people shouldn't be granted freedom of speech. They have inferior genes and so if they talk, another stupid person might be drawn to him/her, then they'd create a cult and spawn mindlessly. Never said I was humanitarian, 'right?

Or maybe we could come to a compromise. Those mentally challenged should choose between Freedom of speech and castration/death sentence so they don't pass on their stupid dominant alleles or their behavior which is the foundation of their children's. My ideals lean towards the utilitarian side of things so I think like this. But I dunno, with all that shit going on with China and their really huge textile industry, cheap labor which affects European workers - maybe it's best if dumb people are prohibited to speak and made to do manual labor. I'm not saying Chinese are dumb 'cos I'm just stating a point regarding manual labor but what I mean is that dumb people from all races should be picked out (and sent to dumb camps) because they're a verifiable source of chaos and waste.

But of course the dumb and beautiful should be kept as pets. They can reproduce if and only if, as soon as the child is born, IT must be sent to anti-dumb institutions in order to propagate the newer generation - now the intelligent and the beautiful - which, in the end will kill the dumb and the ugly (no matter how smart he or she is) alike.

Maybe you all know what I'm alluding to but you're free to interpret this however you like.

Hey, I e-mailed Chelating Compounds and I can't seem to grasp the reason of her elusiveness. We can all be friends here after we tear each other apart...

Not.

It's just surprising how one so righteous would pass over this as we "slander" her.

Tuesday, April 26, 2005

Note of Appreciation

I don't know how else I can effectively argue my ass out of this (not that I'm itching to get said ass off this) without being redundant. That is so because of caffeine-addict and IvyblueSummers who have made their stands so beautifully. See comments on the entry before this.
Thanks also to celestial maiden and moronic mikey who have defended this unworthy person. I suppose our e-mail correspondence has made you understand my/our motives better.
Is it only me or is anyone else going to hurl if he/she hears another rhetorical question? I'm just kidding. It has been a great experience and never have I imagined how much I'd enjoy it when friends and (insert something you admit you are here) flood my comments page. To tell the truth, I'm not the one who was primarily involved here but I had to intervene because Chelating Compounds was cramping my style. No, I'm still kidding. Idiots who say one thing and then another relative to the person who might be viewing the statements annoy me. Textbook definition: Chelating Compounds
I didn't know that our collective disgust for our friend would bring parasitic Anonymous back from the fetid humus where he/she came from. Given the circumstances, there are things that I was led to believe and unless, someone gives a sound argument to contradict it, there'd be no changing of opinions happening here. Right, caffeine?
In summary, which I gather has already been stated by IvyblueSummers so I risk becoming redundant but I feel it has to be placed in this page, people like Chelating Compounds and KanonA are inconsistent dingbats. Therefore, arguing with them is a waste of time. But what a fun time it is, isn't it? Although I must admit KanonA is forgettable. She knows this too because she had to post all her comments twice. Hahaha!
Anyway, there's something that must be said for my intellectuality. I'm not going to deny it. I'm an arrogant intellectual. Period. Don't challenge it or make sarcastic remarks about it because you'll only wind up embarrassing yourself. Also the people I'm with are indeed intellectuals. I'm not the best them. However, the contest for the most obnoxious is still ongoing between me and caffeine-addict. Hahaha!
Assuming that KanonA is indeed not Anonymous, then where oh where could he or she be? Hey, baby, you're in the limelight now so why don't you come out? Maybe you look like a naked molerat who has been molesting parthenogenic snakes. Is it because you aready did? But if there's anything of note that you did, you just made us prouder of ourselves.

Thursday, April 21, 2005

The Feeble-minded and their Champion

To those anonymous people here that do not know me:
What makes you think I'm not doing this for my amusement?

To the first one who said:
so here's the blog of the not so infamous poseur bet you love that.

it's dorian ghey. for someone who thinks highly of themself, you're a real loser. a blog dedicated for flaming? get a life you wannabe.


I'd like to inform you that the infamous real Dorian Ghey who's not as infamous as I am is laughing like a hyena. We've been interacting lately and he's not so dumb to give me such inane comments and use a non-existent word, themself. Miss Stupid, my hide is thick enough to deflect remarks like losers without a life. I have one actually (and I've already said this) but I don't think it's challenging or entertaining enough because my narcissistic nature will only be too obvious if I start annoying the real people around me. And we don't want that. I still need a new TV with progressive scanning in my room. I'm a fucking spoiled brat and life is too easy so I find myself with more time than I could use. My PC life is not entirely better than my real one but the former is far more interesting. Got that?

And to the valiant champion who comes riding in with her shiny armor and humanitarian words:

I'll cut to the chase, all right? KanonA, what the hell is your problem? Don't answer that. I know. I'm amazed that you have the audacity to tell me:

perhaps if you spent more time trying to improve your writing and less time lambasting those that may have a different opinion than you.

I'm not the one who writes like all I've read is fanfiction and Mitch Albom, du null. I read a lot of things to improve my writing and strengthen my intellect even if it's not that obvious. It's just that if it comes from a writer in a mediocre level such as yourself, the advice seems misplaced. Believe it or not, flaming is a pretty decent effort in making a study of teenage intelligence.
It's so stupid that it embarrasses me to explain it. First, I didn't immediately assume that Chelating Compunds is Sey Lee. That was suggested by the great purporter of caffeine addiction. Whatever his reasons are, I'll respect that but I thought Chelating Compounds was you, actually. You've got the same idiotic way of defending yourselves.
I'll break it down.
One writes a fic that is by many standards, far better than the ones around in FFN. Someone else flames it. The writer retaliates. And then you tell the writer that she's a spoilsport for doing so. Do you watch tennis? You get tired of long rallies? I love those things.
Don't you see the point of this blog? I flame and I love it when flamees retaliate. This is the place for testing ballistics. A free for all. I'm not going to tell them to shut up the way you do. Actually, there have been wise ones who said that they'll improve, which is great. And there are dumb ones who flame because their friend got burned. Now, I love flaming because it's amusing to see how people react to a negative stimulus.
You're telling me to stop being hostile. You are being attacked for your inconsistency. Simple as that. You weren't expressing a difference of opinion. You were trying to get a rise from the people you are clearly envious of to lure them into a trap. A trap that might be effective as long as it was set up by someone with a higher intellect. Unfortunately for you. As for the anonymity, I don't think that what you said is the real reason. You wanna hear what it is? You're afraid that these writers would write you off as another wannabe, which you're proving that you are and out of spite, they'd rip your fics apart. You're scared that if they do, you'll be put to shame because they're better writers than you. Chelating is a nice, empty front. No one can throw insults at your creations because they don't exist. Right-o?
The points that I'm driving at are:
1) You're a mediocre writer with no original ideas and you know it
2) You are so green with envy that you had to resort to drastic measures to get a shot in the limelight
3) That these two writers will only listen to accurate advice or ones that have been made by good writers
4) You might be slightly better than the ones that I and the others flame but you still have a long way to go before I regard you as an authority. That's a standard.
5) I'm a notorious fucker who makes lots of assumptions

You tell me stuff about how I slander people. Huff. Gawwd. I get tired of people addicted to their own brand of blind righteousness who says, "Attack the writer's work but not the writer."
Don't you get it? A writer writes what he does because of what he is. Notwithstanding his imagination, it's himself that he puts in his work. If it sucks, then he must have poured shit in it and you can't blame the work for that. It won't exist without the writer.
Perfect case in point: Anne Rice
You say you're tired of flame wars. Then why the fuck did you have to go here of all places? You're like the vegetarian who goes out of his way to hang around in the town's bloodiest abattoir to tell its workers that animal slaughter is unacceptable.
Or maybe you just want a slice of the veal, eh?
I don't have perfect grammar. Neither does caffeine-addict. No one does.
But there you go, swimming in your presumptions that I'm a miserable know-it-all. It must offer you a great deal of comfort in thinking that I'm nothing but a tub of lard with an extremely antisocial or more fittingly, narcissistic behavior that sits in front of the PC all day, terrorizing worms.
I won't stop you. One like you would need petty assurances that if nature made one better in writing than you, then it must follow that you must have a far more spectacular life than him. Your insecurities make you so restless that I am doomed to pity you, attention whore.

Sunday, April 17, 2005

Intelligentsia

To people who have further knowledge regarding that thing that I mailed you about, mail me.

And then I'll tell you why.

Tuesday, April 12, 2005

damn i need your attention!

My dear friends,

Coffee maverick's fic is erased and the joy has ended. tsk tsk tsk. My last review is deliberately 'peppered' with grammatical errors for chelating compunds' eyes to feast on but unfortunately all is over. Anyway, watch out for my new fic which I will release some time this month. It will be a sequel to 'For What it Takes'. Hahaha! I need your help; Night Strider, Mikey, Celestial Maiden, and even Dorian Ghey who cursed me a few days back. We will dedicate it to chelating compounds.


Anyone who wants to help is free to put his suggestion here.

Saturday, April 09, 2005

The Goddess of Hypocrisy and Grammatical Accuracy

This is a message for chelating compounds for her flame to ivysummers because she's so fucking transparent:

WOW!!! Break my shackles Miss Chelating Compounds cos I'd like to praise your Godly skills in English! So, what you're doing is that you flame the works of the flamers. I'm giving you attention because you really really NEED it. I'm praising you because you might suffer a stroke if no one does. Ivy's story is 'peppered' with grammatical errors because in here, KOGURE IS TEACHING RUKAWA HOW TO SPEAK PROPER ENGLISH. You are one dumb hypocrite, I bet people who have read this fic and your review are laughing their asses off, Ivy's English is so difficult for you that you CAN'T even understand the story. Pathetic. Or do you consider her error about Japanese names a grammatical error? Maybe you should go back to third grade and learn more about logic. And you consider a single punctuation error enough to pepper the piece with grammatical errors? Maybe, you should ask your grandma to teach you how to count. Will you?


AND OH MY FUCKING GAY GOD, Rukawa said 'sorry'… the world should end, I say. Why don't you flame all the Yaoi, OC, Shounen-ai and non-yaoi fics and tell them to change the whole plot because believe me, the majority of the stories here contains Rukawa OOCness. Maybe we should watch out because the great editor chelating compounds aka flamer-of-the-flamers-cos-my-talent-is-itching-for-attention will surely accuse us of peppering our works with grammatical errors if ever we commit a single punctuation error and a couple of subject-verb/tense disagreement. AND TO IVYBLUESUMMERS, DORIAN GHEY, CAFFEINE ADDICT AND THE OTHERS; YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO FLAME THE WORKS OF BUDDING AUTHORS BECAUSE CHELATING COMPOUNDS IS THE ONLY QUALIFIED FLAMER AROUND BECAUSE SHE DOESN’T COMMIT GRAMMATICAL ERRORS. Isn’t that so right? Oh, don’t deny that you said that, miss; because you didn’t, actually. But you did make a point of making us feel that way, your Grammatical Highness.

‘How this egoism remind him of Mitsui!’, ‘Did somebody just whispered ‘crick’? Or was it ‘trick’? ---This 2 sentences are the only ones that contain grammatical errors in them. Does that mean that the fic is ‘peppered with grammatical errors’? How so?


Actually, a lot of coffee-maverick's reviewers are boiling their BLOOD OVER YOU, you might wanna check out what they say about you in 'The Ice Prince's World'.